CHARLIE KIRK UTAH ON THE GROUND UPDATE • UT IN FEAR 👀🇺🇸 EXPOSING AN OP

I, I obtained a receipt from paying which Utah which according to a waiter and a waitress over there, belong to Tyler Robinson on September the 10th of 2025. It has two time stamps on it. One is 855 PM. The second one is 840 or sorry, 940 PM, which is when he checked out. This, this is a problem for the prosecutor's timeline because according to their timeline, Tyler Robinson is in Orham texting his alleged boyfriend saying that he is there watching waiting to go retrieve his grandfather's weapon. There's a problem there because if he's in Orham, he can't be in language. If he's in language, he can't be in Orham. You guys already know about this. It's been over and over and over. It's obvious that the establishment is very concerned about it because they keep bringing it up. They keep bringing it up. They keep trying to discredit it. They keep trying to say that it's fake. Keep trying to say that the, you know, that the receipt ain't real all that. And it's really funny. That being said, I have retained the services of an attorney here in Utah. He is going to be submitting some evidence to the case via official channels. That's that. The thing about it was, as I was trying to hunt down attorneys that would carry out this task, I was met with all kinds of reluctance. I couldn't figure out why. Why are attorneys turning down money? I thought attorneys loved money. I thought attorneys loved to get paid, right? Aren't they known as money sucking vampires? Right? Aren't they? Isn't that what the M.O. is? That we charge $1,000 an hour or whatever. That's something ridiculous. So, when I finally found an attorney, he told me that the Robinson family had reached out to him to try to find representation for their son. And he had declined. And the reason that he had declined is because he was afraid of being a target by the DOJ and by the state. And not only him, numerous attorneys that I reached out to today to try to carry out this task declined on that basis. Declined on that basis. Some of them very, very emotionally will say, it should not be like this. During the course of my investigations here, there are witnesses to the Charlie Kirk case that are not a part of the case. They're not a part of the case at all. And it's not because they haven't been requested by the defense or by the prosecution or by the FBI. It is because they are being pressured not to speak out. Not just one, not just two dozens. Dozens of people are in fear to come forward because of possible or implied or stated retro-reution by authorities. And when I say authorities, I mean every level of authority you can think of related to government, especially here. Multi-agency. And I'm not going to play it, but I have not with the one that I was just talking about, but you guys like my shirt? Let me see. The one I was just talking about, but sorry, my moderate just came out. I was so floored by listening to this, the first attorney I call it today. I was like looking up reputable attorneys with like good, if you don't know what ABBO is, ABBO was like this public forum website review site for attorneys nationwide. And it's kind of like the Google review of attorneys. And so I'm shopping for like good reputable attorneys established. And the first one I called, he was crazy. He was very reluctant. He actually, he just straight up said, no, no, I'm not going to mind that for you. And he, so the one that I ended up talking to at length said that he said that the word up there is, is that, or boy, his colleagues, right, his colleagues in the, because there's not really a lot of people in Utah. And so he's like the the attorney world in Utah, it's like a community. They're all very familiar with each other, right. They know each other. They're not all friends, but they all know each other. And he said when Tyler Robinson was first arrested and they were trying to find an attorney for him, dozens of attorneys were looked for and dozens of attorneys declined based on they did not want to be a target of the state, particularly the DOJ. The DOJ. This is Utah. Why should attorneys be afraid to practice or represent clients regardless of who it is, what the crime is, and Utah of the federal government. Why? It should not be like that. There's a very famous quote by a very, very important founder of our country that speaks to if we are living, we should live in fear. If we live in fear of our government, it is tyranny, right. If the government lives in front, if fear of us, that's freedom. And right now, I can tell you, having spent weeks here, having spent probably over a month here, a month here, cumulatively, over the last year, that the citizens of Utah are afraid of their government, period, 100%. Not just like the local Utah government, but repercussions for them speaking out from the local level all the way up to the top, to the FBI and the DOJ. And that is just nuts to me. That is nuts to me. Witnesses that I have spoken to here, that will give you tidbits of information, or give you perspective about things on the condition that you don't reference it specifically at all in any wake capacity that could come back to them because they are afraid. The things that I have discovered about the, I can't even say it. I can't even say it yet. The things that I have discovered about what's been going on here on the ground, both leading up to Charlie Kirk's assassination and afterwards is, it's nothing short of criminal. Nothing short of criminal. And it's going to come out. And I might even the one with the main bits of it. I just know. I just know no. And it is very sad, very sad to be an American, to be in a freedom-loving state. You know, there's a high constitutional carry here in Utah. These are Constitutional loving Americans. And they are living in fear. Living from fear of speaking the truth, fear of retribution, fear of retaliation. That's terrorism. That's terrorism. If you live in fear to speak truth about something so heinous as a, as a, as an assassination, a public assassination, then we might as well be living in China. If the state has that kind of power over US citizens to where they can't exercise the most basic fundamental right, which is your freedom of speech, out of fear of retribution from your government, then we are not living in a free country. This is not a free country if that is the case. And right now, we need more than ever our, our is grit collective grit. We need people to understand that they have to risk everything, everything in order to keep this country free right now. And there's going to be probably some losses, even myself, I've considered this numerous times. People say in my replies go look, stay safe. Truth tellers usually end up, telling the truth is usually harmful to the teller. That's what they say. And I know that's to facts. I know that's a fact, but that is something that I had to reconcile myself. And a lot of us have to, right? Like if we, if we want to secure a free legacy and not leave our kids in China, or something ran like China, and I'm not China, hey, don't Chinese, but I don't, I'm not big on authoritarian, um, then we have to sacrifice. We have to be willing to risk everything, our forefathers risk everything. Uh, they had insurmountable odds to free themselves from a tyrannical government. And this is how we came to be. This is exactly how we came to be. Now I want to do a little, a little like what I think I will do is do a little staging to tell you, to show you how the government is currently running some operations. And I think that the best way to do it is I'm going to an employee rock for this. I realize she's not everybody's favorite, but she's going to be a little storyteller. Um, we're going to talk about the governor Whitmer kidnapping case. The guys aren't familiar with it. Happened within the last few years. And what that was is there were, it was a federal operation, where the feds, if the particularly the FBI, um, in conjunction with their partners on social media and et cetera, had created these Facebook groups that were like militia, Facebook groups. And they, they co-opted these online groups, right? They infiltrated them, they created them, they created a whole backstories, romantic backstories, right, of these partners and these couples, et cetera. And and used all kinds of surveillance tools to, to observe the lives of these individuals and then use that information. We're talking about collecting their trash, monitoring their communications online, discord chats, group chats, text messages, phone calls, uh, uh, video surveillance, they planted bugs at the, uh, rifle range where they would go, they would go practice hooting. They, they planted bugs in their garages, right? They did a lot. And they use compromised federal assets to do it. You don't know what that is, federal informants. So let's just say, let's just say you have a guy who has a, uh, long wrap sheet, which is a lot of, a lot of criminal records felonies. He's been in and out of prison. He gets in trouble regularly and he gets caught. He gets hemmed up in something and in, you're like, man, how's this guy have six felonies? Why isn't he in prison? Not getting out of your prison. Well, he's probably, he's probably a narc, if you don't know what a narc is, it's a snatch, somebody that tattletails, et cetera. Now I'm not, I am not condoning like not reporting on crimes that you see, right? I'm not saying that. But this is somebody who actively tries to get people hemmed up with the law to keep themselves out of getting hemmed up with the law, right? They, they are a work