🔥📖🎙️BIBLE WEEKLY: Matthew Chapter 7 and The Character of God

I like the name, Hyward Bob Radio. I can dig it. I'm gonna see you guys. We're starting off as always, a little bit, at a new time, a new time slot, a little bit early. Don't leave us 7 p.m. East Central Time, now at 6 p.m. And I'm not worried glad that you guys are with us. If you could down at the bottom right hand corner, just repost the room as we start letting people kind of trickle in and out, because why don't we repost the room? Because that's what Jesus would do. That's correct, good answer. Everybody got that one right. Let me check in with the two lovely, beautiful, effeminate. Can't think of anything else. That was about it. Shane and Barbie, let me go. Who will we go with first? Let's go with Barbie. Oh, with Shane thought for sure it was him. I know he did, but we're gonna, let's check in with Barbie. See what she's after. Barbie. How are you? How's your knee? I thought for sure it was Shane too, but... I was reading it. Yeah, I was reading it. Barbie, look, tell me... Don't tell me all the wonderful things that have been going on with your family. I want to know... I want to know about the heat that's going on on X, man. I want to know what's up. One of our own guys, Bible Weekly, should be an attack on X, they're going after her. I want to know about it. I want to know what's going on. Tell me. Oh, I'm not. It's just not a big deal. It's not me being attacked. I mean, this is like standard for me. I volunteer for these fights, so... Not like I don't know they're coming. I just always laugh at how simple I did people are. No, it's because I'm going after the people who are trying to pollute the jury pool, or I don't even know what they're really trying to do with the Brian Cole case. Pretty much, they decided that we're gonna now have trials in the court of public opinion based on propaganda and nonsense. And so I have been trying to at least like debunk and nonsense are putting out, but God, they put it out so fast that it's very hard to keep up. I'm just telling you, it's hard to keep up. Let me ask you a question, and you can answer this, and this is, and anybody else can feel free to jump in there as well. But I just want to ask you, I'm basically a common sense question, okay? Let's say, oh, a hypothetical rather. So let's say that I'm in whatever the neck of the woods that you live in, right? Let's say I'm in your neighborhood, I'm walking around. And all of a sudden they find out, now let's say I live in that neighborhood or whatever. Let's say they find out that something bad happened, and they want to accuse me of doing it, right? Now, I could be at home watching television, I could be having dinner with the people that I live with, I could be out shopping somewhere or whatever it is, right? I could be doing something like that. If you're gonna accuse me of doing it, you better make sure all those bases are covered, because one, if you accuse me of it, and you've got me at home with my family eating dinner, then the entire narrative blows up, right? Well, I find interesting about this situation. Again, I don't have any idea who's right or who's wrong or whatever. But what I find is that the guy being accused, the guy who's, their alleging is falsely accused, the guy that all this stuff, it just so happens that this guy was not at home watching TV or having dinner with his family. He actually happened to be out walking around that area at the same time. So now again, son of a detective, try to break things down to the lowest common denominator. If these, and all the other situations, I'm not gonna get in all those, but that's a weird scenario, don't you think? I also think it's weird how we keep discussing things that have nothing to do with the actual case at hand. So right now the controversy is there's some new video that was released that supposedly puts this guy at a different location at the time of the crime. But they can't verify if it's this guy or not. So we're having two hour podcasts about every single other topic under the sun, which I don't even like think about anymore because it's irrelevant because at the end of the day, the first five minutes of the podcast you hear, if in fact that is him, oh, if, okay, so you have no idea, got it. So we're back to nothing and why are we having this conversation? I don't know because in my opinion, we should be deciding cases like in court and not in the court of public opinion where people can throw in whatever information they want to throw in and take the jury pool. We saw that with Tyler Robinson. We see that now with Brian Cole, but the crazy lady who got sadly killed her kids. What was her name? Oh my god, Kimberly, I forgot her name. Lindsey, can't see. This is like the new, this is the new way to completely deconstruct our constitutional order because if we don't have a system of jurisprudence and we don't have courts, I'm not saying Brian Cole is guilty. He might be innocent. I know I'm not on the jury. A jury of his peers is going to sit down and review the evidence and either convict him or not convict him. I can tell you based on the evidence that I have reviewed, they have way more than enough to hold a rest time and hold it for trial. Period point blank. Like they're way more than enough and the person they accused has an alibi and is suing for defamation. So I don't know, for rational people who look at facts that is enough, but that's no longer the case and the reason for that is because if you want to try and deconstruct our system of justice, how do you do it? You fight outside the courts. This is why I don't like all of these tactics. They're all very malignant and detrimental to like having a constitutional order where people can look at evidence and figure out what's true and what's not. We're coming up to a situation where people can't even like figure out what's important to talk about. Like why are you talking about what happened on January 6th? Who cares? Let me ask you this. Do you think that it's ironic that because I have a lot of good friends that are on the total opposite side of you? And but I do find it ironic. Like you preface the things that you post by saying, listen, don't listen to me. Do not believe me. Look on your own, find your own, do your own stuff. I can tell you that here's a link to every single thing that I just said, if they're wrong, this is where I got it from. I find, do you find it a little bit ironic that the same thing that you're doing to this accusation, that they're doing to you, what's supposedly the government is doing to that kid? No, because that's the tactics of people who believe in liberal authoritarian government or want that. I can't, people who live in a constitutional republic are going to actually think about the information. I think about the information I put up. I'm supposed, I mean, I'm an anonymous account. Okay, I think 10 times about the information I put out, the more followers I accumulated, the more careful I was about the information I put out, the more worried I am when I put something out. And the faster I am to correct myself, if it comes out that I'm wrong. And I've been wrong many times. Like this is the right space for this, but we all fall short of the glory of God. We will be wrong many times. The goal is to course correct. And to just say you're wrong, why? And keep moving forward. No one's expecting perfection from anybody. I don't even expect it for myself. So I don't understand why you can't just say, you know what? I said it was a fed-surrection for a year. I made a lot of money off of that. That was my bad. I was wrong. Sorry. And then stop with the narrative. But you can't do that. So they hold on to these narratives. What that's doing is making people who are ordinary people not able to critically think about what's happening because there is a name for all of this. I posted all this today. There's like a million different names for this and a million different traditions that it's come up in. But one of them is like called a fire hose of falsehoods where you throw pretty much throw garbage at the wall and see what sticks. You put enough garbage out in the ethos. Nobody can debunk anything. Nobody has the time to keep up with the debunking of the claims. It's like Candace. When you're on claim number 1,194, who the heck remembers when she was talking about a year ago? I certainly don't. I don't know what she was talking about. Legions and planes and maroon t-shirts and exploding microphones. Our society becomes ungovernable because we can no longer decipher the truth from the lies. And at that point is when you end up within authoritarian leader because people are going to throw their hands up in the air and say, somebody just saved me from the chaos. That is why I hate chaos. That is why I hate propaganda. That is why I hate disinformation. You don't have to agree with me. But I would recommend that you start using your brain and thinking because that is very important. Whether or not you end up on the same page as me, the fact that you can't rationally think through anything other than calling people names and add hominem attacks is a great indicator that we are not headed in the right direction of society. I'm just saying. Not that I care what people call me. It's a very sad indicator for us and the future of society. Well, I just think it's kind of... I've gotten a couple of DMs from some mutuals as Hitch would call them. Some mutuals who tell me that I need to rethink like what I'm fit, you know, that blah, blah, blah, this and that. And I'm thinking like, man, I don't know. I wasn't there. I've seen a grainy video that I don't know who that is. And again... I really don't know who that is. See Baker, the first thing he said, if that is in fact him, meaning I don't know for sure if that's him. So what are we even talking about? Why are we saying things like free people? You don't know that? Okay, you want an investigation fine. I support that. You can tell the FBI they should investigate. They have investigated. They're not retarded. I'm sorry. I've read all the core filings. They know what they're doing. Just saying. You would think the defense would be pretty exciting about this. It's cut and dry. They have the evidence. They're proclaiming it as absolute truth. Anybody that questions the narrative is absolutely crazy. And I can't believe the defense isn't just like so excited about this. I mean, this is going to win the court. Yeah, no, they said. They said, The former prosecutor who works in the defense office who used to be a prosecutor for the government he just added that person to the case as a defense attorney. You don't add high-power defense attorneys when your case is like on solid ground and you're going to close. You add more high-power defense attorneys when it's in trouble. Yeah, but the thought, Stephen, I thought they just solved the whole thing. I mean, it's over. Right? I see a good indicator to me when I'm right about something is the more viciously I get attacked for like stating facts. Not listen, I've had moments on here where I regret it's things I said. I get that. I'm talking about like just stating the facts. The more viciously I get attacked and the more like below the belts it is, the more over the target I am about what it is that I'm actually investigating because again, normal people don't have, I don't have reactions like that. I don't even look at the comments. I could care less, but I don't have reactions like that because I think it's a little crazy to react this way to like basic facts that people can discuss openly. They can agree to disagree, but this whole like cult of personality, you must free the, it's got to, you have to think this way because this person said so I don't think about anything no matter what anybody tells me. I don't care. I will verify whether it comes from the left, right, center. It doesn't matter. Nobody warns my trust anymore. Not in this information environments. I reckon people do the same if they can. And the thing is is no, and the reason, again, one reason why we're talking about this is because we talk about this in the back channels. But see, I, that's one thing that impresses me with, with Barbies that we do talk in the back channels about this. And I just find it very impressive that someone can be as cool about this because like that's not necessarily my gift or say, per se. So I am impressed with the fact that you can do this. What I don't understand is, is, well, I'll leave that for the day. But my point is in moments like this, these are the times when you're tested, when your faith is tested, when your behavior is tested, when your, when your witness is tested, when your representation of Christ is tested, it is these moments that do it, you know. And so many people say so many negative things about someone who just asks questions or even talks about something like a sort of authority. God forbid someone says, you know what, I got it wrong. But isn't it weird that we live in a society today that we will manipulate anything to not be wrong? But somebody's got to be wrong. If you disagree, someone has to be wrong, you know. And so I just find it odd that, okay, like I think Barbie would have no issue with doing that at all. If it turns out that she's wrong, I got it wrong. I think that's that in my post. I go, if it in the end it turns out that this is the guy in the video, I will say I was wrong. But right now nobody has proven that. So like, what are we talking about? Yeah. Yeah. And it's, look, all I'm saying, and again, Occam's razor is a big thing with me. Also, you know, it's famously aligned from, from Star Trek 2. But once you eliminate the impossible, whatever else remains, no matter how improbable, that is your answer. So all I'm saying is you can't be lost. Am I the only one that lost Mike there? No, I'm lost. So while we're waiting for Mike to find his mic, I'll say this as I listen to you guys, as I watch what's happening on the timeline, it blows my mind that you have random people all over the world that weigh in with their opinions and then get mad at each other. Meanwhile, guess what, we're Americans. It's innocent till proven guilty and we have juries for this reason. And it's like everybody's forgotten that. And I know Barbie made this point already. But when did we stop? I mean, I get it, right? Oh, the FBI, the CIA, you know, we don't trust them. Okay, fine, you don't trust them. But I trust the jury. Are they perfect? No. But that's why we have the jury system we have, you know, where both sides get a chance to eliminate jurors and select jurors. And the system we have is pretty good. Go ahead, Barbie. You have to learn how to trust the facts that are before you. You don't have to trust the system or politicians. You have to trust the facts and then you have to trust reality. And so you can't make blanket statements that everything is corrupt and everybody's corrupt. You know how many people it would take to corrupt an official proceeding? Like 2000 people who touch that case. Like we need to be able to go back to reality and say we can't make these blanket statements that everything is corrupt. And this is like sweeping like doom and gloom. The world is ending statements. The only thing those things do is shut down your ability to sing critically and to examine evidence critically and to figure out what is true and what is not. And as Christians, we have a duty in obligation to look for the truth wherever we