TPUSA VS UVU SECURITY FAILURE • FEDSLOPPER KNEW ABOUT KIRK HIT BEFORE

is supposed to prove from the lies. This is for the people trying to see who the disguise diligent and isn't where the real can survive. Shout out, Unconfined for the song. Much appreciated, sir. Love that. That's Unconfined with a K over there on X and his handle on YouTube is right there. All right. So yeah, this is gonna be funny. This is gonna be funny when I promise. All right. So I need some speakers up here. Get up here, people. I need some speakers requests. Don't be scared. It's okay. I want if I'm going to host the space, I need participants or I won't host spaces anymore. All right. Let's see Tyler. Okay. So let's get this one out of the way first. So if you've been following me for any amount of time, you'll know that Candace Owens broke the Tyler Robinson being in a language story in January of this year. All right. The mainstream media picked it up. The New York Post picked it up. The box news digital picked it up. They went and interviewed allegedly had some had some merit. Nobody debunked it then. And then I went there and talked to the owner and the staff and got an interview and copy of a receipt. And the Fed sloppers have been moving the goalpost on this thing. Since day one, first they said that I faked it. They said that I was a fraud. I fraud it. Right. I fabricated this receipt. I paid somebody to wear a restaurant shirt and pretend as if they were a waiter. That was the first claim. And then after I provided the entire audio of my trip there and an unredacted version of the video I did, they changed all of a sudden. Now the receipts real, the interviews real, the waiter's real. But but there's a signature on this no signature contact list. All of a sudden this magic signature appeared a year later. And it was they were saying that the signature didn't belong to tile robins. They couldn't tell me who it belonged to because it's just a bunch of squiggles. Right. You know, but they know it's not tile robins. We don't know who it is, but we know it's not tile robins. And that was the next goalpost, right. And so after I showed how asked and I and the other thing that I did was I showed the how asked and I and that was didn't stick didn't stick. They're moving the goalpost again. So last night I was over in an X space. And Andrew Wilson, I don't know if you don't know who Andrew Wilson is. He is the, the guy that debated Candace Owens, paid her to $300,000 to get publicly humiliated in my opinion. She smashed him. And then he came into an X space and debated me about the receipt. And seemingly received another humiliation. I didn't get paid for it though. Although if he wants to send me a donation, my tip jar is open. So. So last night he comes into an X space. And says that he has says that he has. I guess he's here's what he said. I'll read you my post here over on X. You guys can follow along. If you go look at my timeline. Does this Tyler Robinson 910, Pangement receipt shenanigans. That's what it is. All of these, all of these shenanigans that tried to disprove this. Andrew Wilson showed his hand last night instead of just giving out the card holder name. On the transaction for the alleged Tyler Robinson Pangement receipt. I think he looked through and found a matching last four card number of a quote unquote regular. Apparently willing to say that he was there for that meal. And I asked him last night. I said, how many variations of card numbers are there for a last four digits. So if I have, let's just say that the last four of my card number is three, four, five, six. Okay, that is one out of 10,000. Okay, zero through 9,999. Okay, that's how many variations of card numbers there are. If you have the last four. So 10,000, one in 10,000. Okay. So if you have a restaurant that is a, in a path to a tourist attraction, that attracts two million people annually. That is how many people go through Pangement every year, two million people. Okay. So this very well established that's been there since the 90s as far as I can tell, has a an amazing repertoire of beautiful food, delicious food, love it. The brisket I cannot recommend it enough. That brisket melts in your mouth. I would highly suggest it. People travel from all over the state to go eat at this restaurant. Okay, it is a good business. It is a good business as quality staff, as quality food, quality service, and the establishment is beautiful. It's very rustic has, it has a good theme to it. It's all well done. Can't say anything. I have no complaints about that place whatsoever. And so let's just add through a number out there. Let's just say that there's 45,000 people that visit that restaurant. Individual credit card purchases or debit card purchases. Excuse me, which is just a number that I threw out. I'm not sure how much traffic this place gets. I'm just throwing it out there. I'm just saying it's on the, it's on the tourist attraction path for that area. Pangwich is a small town. You actually have to cut through Pangwich to get to a lot of the parks over there, including Zion, including Dixie forests, all that. Very beautiful over there. And so it gets a lot of through traffic tourist traffic, and it has a population of like 1500 to 2000. It gets a lot of that touric traffic, sorry, tourist traffic through. So let's just say it's 45,000 people in a year. If you have one in 10,000 and you average that out, that means that you will hit the same four card numbers for about every four or five people. Right. I'm sorry, you'll hit four or five of the same card numbers per year, at least. If those people, I'm sorry, on average, not at least, if those people are regulars, then the the propensity for that card number to match goes up. What am I saying? I'm saying that having the last four of the card number that matches somebody else at the restaurant is not only likely, it's common. Not only is it common, statistically, it happens with 100% certainty, statistically. This is you can go check my math on this. Anybody can fact check me, go check my math. So instead of just doing this, right? If you're going to jump through all these hoops, you put out the squiggly line signature, trying to disprove it. Now you're trying to say that you have the matching last four of a regular just put out the card holders first name. Show the transaction with the card holders name, just the first name, not the last name. But it's a rest. I will stop talking about paying which, if you release a partial of the card holders first name, and it is not Tyler Robinson, why don't you just do that? Why don't you just do that? Why go through all of this trouble? We're in months of this now, months of trying to debunk this and failing because you refuse to do the easiest solution. The only thing that can prove it with certainty, which is to show the card holders name, that's it. That's all you got to do. That's all you had to do in the beginning. That's all you got to do now. Until then, until then, I am not going to accept any more of the slop. I'm not going to engage with it anymore. I am not going to entertain it anymore. This is just noise. It's just noise. This is just attempts to deflect without actually having to prove anything. Right. This is an attempt to decrease public pressure on this specific angle of the investigation. So that people don't ask too many questions or demand answers for this particular angle. So until this question has been answered fully, which is, what is the card holders name, at least to a certain degree, it can be initials. Right. Redact everything, but the first two letters. Initials aren't sharing privacy. Until that happens, I'm not letting the story go. So there you have it. But if you do do that, if you do release the card holders name for that specific transaction, not not for a similar card holders number for other transactions, you're trying to put in front of us and say, see, this person hits you all the time. He has the last same matching for. Well, so do probably five or 10 other customers there have the same last matching for statistically. It is impossible for that not to happen given the traffic. So if you want a hundred percent certainty, one way or the other, just share the card holders name, put it to rest. You've had plenty of time, right. I reported Candace Owens reported this in January. I reported it in July. Okay. Let's just think about that. Okay. January to July is seven months. And then I reported it in a whole another wave of attacks came from it. And here we are. Okay. We have July, August, now September. That's nine months. Nine. Crazy. Absolutely crazy. A whole baby, whole babies have been conceived and born. And the time that it has taken for you to answer this question about him being in a language. Whole babies, whole humans have been conceived and born. And the time frame that it has, you have spent dilly dallying about whether or not Tyler Robinson was in a language. Imagine that whole generations of babies are out there. Some of you people should name your kids, Pangewich or something. All right. Anyways, that was dumb. All right. Yeah. Let's see. So I think I've addressed that. That's the math on that. I just got ahead of it. I don't know why Andrew Wilson showed up in that space and then announced their strategy. I guess it gave me an opportunity to point out how retarded it was. I did it during the space. Now I'm doing it again. This is simple math. Okay. You have four numbers zero through nine. Okay. That is zero through nine, nine, nine, nine. You have 10,000 variations there. It's really, really simple math. Anyways, if you want some homework, go ahead and check my math on that and see if it's right. The only thing that you could arguably say is not right is the 45,000 different cover customer debit cards. Because I don't know how much traffic that restaurant actually gets. I'm just making a assumption based on the fact that there's two million people that travel through Pangewich annually. And the popularity of that particular spot has incredible reviews. So anyways, anyways, anyways, anyways, moving on from that, moving on from that. They can't let the receipt go. They can't let it go. Let's see. All right. So I want to get into this lawsuit for a second. This morning it was reported by Fox News says, quote, I think there's music here and I don't want it to come on. Says quote, Erica Kirk is moving closer to wrongful death loss. Over the security decisions surrounding her husband's assassination, saying the TPUSA team raised concerns before Charlie ever took stage. Zach, I saw that you had kind of posted this this morning and it went viral. If you want to come up and comment on it with love to hear from you. All right, let's. I'm not following you. I changed that. Sorry about that. All right. So. And then here's the filing down here. Obviously I can't read it. Sam Parker. He put out a good post about this. That's where I got the screenshot. Make sure you go follow him on X. He does really good work. But they also pointed out and I saw Zach and Candace also pointed out that there is an independent review about the security snafu that occurred. The day of Charlie Kirk's assassination. We don't know. It looks like TPUSA may be trying to throw you view you under the bus. And you you had a wanted an independent assessment.