Transcript
600 km på testen så är det en så små, selektiv,
data set, det är tjus, och de konkurrenade att FSD
var som time speeding i 30 km nörsons.
Jag tror att det höjst eller mediemspid,
det var speeding, det var som för det 5 km nörsor.
Så, like, 50 % över det speed limit,
du märker sig.
Det är inte bra, men
det är det som du har
30 km en av våra sones
i Europa.
Det är det som du ska betäkta på
det därstjärns.
Och det är det som är det
mest bra för
för accident är
diskränta driving.
People picking up their phones, driving these zones,
även not like passing a speed limit, just not looking at the road,
somebody steps out, boom, you have an accident.
That doesn't happen with FSD.
However, FSD should be able to follow the speed limit,
even though the speed of set isn't set higher,
because what they claim here is that the FSD
read the speed sign in the wrong way,
even though it said 30,
FSD kind of thought it was 50 or whatever.
It visualized it, but it didn't have it on the screen.
Yeah, just because it's not.
The nation itself.
But as I said in the beginning,
the biggest reason for accidents in 30 km
now or so is distracted driving,
and FSD doesn't drive distracted.
Sure, I was surprised how mellow the report was,
and it's reported as damming on the FSD article I sent you,
and it's just disappointing.
Yeah, the biggest surprise for me is like,
why is folks at business reporting on some activist group
or whatever doing their own testing Belgium?
And it's basically driving how humans are,
except it has superhuman reaction time.
So the whole speed limit,
this is down the road conversation,
but speed limits can increase
once we all have robot drivers,
because they have better reaction times.
Yeah, yeah.
I, yeah, I know that FSD have had issues
with the speed sign reading in Europe before,
but it has gotten a lot better.
Like, yeah, just a year ago,
so it was much, much worse.
And it fixed a lot of issues.
Is that a common law that there's no passing bicycle is?
Because I think I don't think that exists anywhere in America.
I don't know.
Do we have that in Sweden?
I don't think we have that, to be honest.
Because that was just a super,
super niche thing that they're saying,
it's unsafe around bikes,
but that law doesn't exist really for any place for office.
Yeah, well, if you read a report that they actually themselves made,
they say that FSD is very courteous
to bicycles and pedestrians.
Oh, I figured that their test video was amazing.
It was yielding to on truck coming traffic.
It was what had given my state its three feet
is the law for space for passing bicycles.
And it did all that.
And it, I don't know, if you do that test in America,
that that pass, pass amazing.
So to say, yeah, it did poorly at all.
Yeah, I bet if you give, if you test,
if you drive FSD, there are a hundred times.
And you test that against a hundred humans
with a hot tinder match,
I bet the humans will crash more often than FSD.
I'm just saying.
Yeah, I'm curious that this is part of why Wisconsin did not pass.
The motorcycle lobbyist was very successful in Wisconsin.
EV laws, they had springtime legislation.
They could have passed autonomous vehicle rides share legislation
and just they missed another year.
So they'll try again next spring.
Motor bikes, like they should want people
using FSD, like distracted drivers.
Again, like distracted driving is probably
the number one killer of motorcyclists.
I'm just saying.
Absolutely.
And yeah, so that's the group driving
some of the conversation in the Midwest.
It's called a bait.
And there are motorcycle lobbyists group.
And I ride a motorcycle.
So I know all the talking points of how to ride safely
and just to say FSD doesn't see you is insane.
Because yeah, if eight more cameras,
then that a human would.
It's like lung cancer survival groups,
one of band kind of the low passing
of banning, smoking indoors at restaurants.
That's kind of the same thing here.
It's so like,
contradictory to the goals they actually want to achieve.
And that makes me think that most of these organizations
are not even like there for the reasons they claim.
Like they just like put the name on it
and then they just love before whatever the industry
or whatever unions want pretty much.
Yeah.
And motorcycles in America generally are like
Harley riders.
Like the average age of motorcycles
is like there's a huge gap between like 20 and 60 year olds.
And they're having a resurgence
from the just people have loved their cars
the last 30 years.
So it's all boomers running these groups on Harley's
and yeah.
I've never met a guy that owns a motorcycle
and a Tesla or an EV at all.
We feel like my ority of like bikers hate EVs.
They even hate electro propulsion so much
that they wouldn't even wave at like a guy riding an EV bike.
That's just like off the limits.
That is the level of hate against electrification.
I don't really understand why.
Yeah, I generally hate driving
because compared to a bike, you're just you got your two hands on.
You can't even take your phone out.
There's no air conditioner or radio to mess with.
And you're just so focused where car is just like you're
it's just so safe.
And even if you do crash, it's like there's the risk
is so much lower.
So you're just not paying attention while driving.
At least you're ascente.
So we're trying to compare are we comparing what's happening
over there to the legislation that's happening in Minneapolis.
So my the lobbyist for a motorcycle group in Illinois
cited a Fox News report about a Belgian study.
And so this this Belgian studies influencing my Illinois
politics.
So that's why I'm I'm chatting with Alexander today.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That is so retarded.
Yeah, so did you see the there's a funny video.
I forgot maybe Omar post somebody posted it.
Maybe it was James Stevenson of the cats.
Yeah, he was like, you know, there's just running over cats.
And we just, you know, that could be someone's pet.
We just can't have that.
I'm like, these are the morons we have like, Nets, a please.
I know you guys are working on the federal landscape for
every eighties.
Please, please speed up as fast as you can because these
people are like legit morons.
And I can't believe like the public is listening to these
people.
It's absolutely embarrassing.
I think I listened to about three hours of the transportation
than a committee of a hold meeting.
Three days of meetings I've listened to across the last two
weeks of the Minnesota legislation.
And all the people in favor of the ordinance that would
require human drivers that's all like emotional arguments
and that the cat one is probably the best example of that.
But yeah, they're just like, Trump has impacted our
immigrant community with operation.
They called it midway blitz in Chicago, but they had another
name for it in Minneapolis.
So Metro is surged.
He's like, are people are still like reeling from Metro's
surge?
And now we're going to fire all these immigrant workers.
And like a large amount of them are Somali, which is I don't
care, but it's they got all the talking point in the news
in the favor, their favor, I guess.
And then all the people against the ordinance are obviously
like, this is not the jurisdiction of the board to say we're
going to stop technology.
Yeah, it's pretty hard to listen to.
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know how you did that, Trent.
Much respect because I would have wanted to.
Yeah, yeah, that's I leave it on fast forward.
I tune in an hour later and I just listen to like 1.5 speed.
And yeah, that's that's the way to go.
But the mayor is expected to veto it.
He said that this is is preempting state legislation that's
not even set in stone yet.
And so it's just poor, poor governance, regardless of
relevant of the topic.
So he can veto.
Yeah, so he has he has five days except Sunday he has said
that he intends on it because what I just said, it's a duplicated
the menace, menace, municipality should not be
overriding the state.
Even though they have a home rule, they're allowed to, but
the state hasn't even legalized it.
They're it's going to come up again in the spring legislative
session at the Capitol.
So the fact that the municipality is trying to restrict
something that doesn't exist yet technically.
Yeah, that's why he just wants to throw out the legislation, which is bad for
the board because they're kind of wasting their time.
They're going to have to do it all over again if they want to.
So he's expected to veto it in five days from yesterday except
Sunday.
So whatever that is, two zero ones today, hopefully.
Well, I hope that gets resolved sooner or later.
But I mean, you still have FSD rights.
So be happy with that, I guess.
Yeah.
Thank you for letting me complain about the state of
legislation in these blue states of America.
It's just silly.
Should be all approved yesterday.
Yeah, almost more interesting than Uppsala news.
Staying again, more interesting than Uppsala news.
Never mind.
Yeah, internal joke.
Anyways, let's see.
Well, we have a good amount of people here on the speaker board.
Now we had Omar, we had a Tesla land on how you guys doing.
It's like you're shouting out all the names and then say how you guys
do it and everybody's like, who's going to speak first?
Sorry for interrupting you Omar.
How you doing?
Good.
Everyday sweet.
Yeah, I saw your video that you posted yesterday about your friend trying FSD for the first
time.
I didn't watch it all, but I watched it beginning.
That was kind of funny reaction.
Yeah, they're loving it.
They're like holy shit.
I had no idea this existed.
I think Omar approved me.
I did not.
Omar, Omar my stuff.
Omar is the guilty one.
Yeah, I'm fully record.
It was Omar.
Omar.
Yeah, I'm sure I'm sure he was.
How do I know how to sweet?
One out of three chance.
I nail it.
How is that?
Anyway, so what do you guys think about this tears energy increasing only 9% to
the person?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
You can't just come up here and start some like topic or whatever.
That is for later.
You get your chance.
Okay.
Beard Tesla.
Just a quick question at what point do we stop giving this guy a platform?
Ask Omar.
Okay.
I don't mind opposing views and constructive conversations.
I think those are really important, but the level of emotional sourced data is just unbelievable
with this guy.
Alex, let's start the day off strong.
What do we want to start with today, Alex?
Yeah.
Uppsala.
No, no, no, no, Uppsala news this week, sadly.
You have to wait for next week.
Then I can tell you in person.
But so we have the big news of the day is obviously the beat on the Q free numbers and.
Damn, I asked people yesterday.
What their prediction was for the delivery number and overly was off by like 27 cars.
57.
That is the most accurate prediction I've ever seen about the other.
How do you insider trading, bro?
Yeah.
Listen.
You know, yeah.
No.
But you know, people are like asking like sending me DMs are like, how do you how do you know?
So close and I was like, well, one, it was a fucking guess.
Okay.
And two, I just.
You know, I don't.
I see people a lot of times they look at these.
These, these, the analysts like that, you know, track everything.
But I actually like talk to other people, like outside of them.
And, you know, who made, you know, know some things.
But like it was a, it was a guess.
And the, if you just, if you just looked at the pattern from the start of even Q1.
You can see this trend.
And I just.