SINE’s Space: #02 EVERYTHING IS A LIE❓❔

comic masterpiece, Mr. Bean opens in the dead of night on a deserted London street. A spotlight appears, the title character falls from the sky and acquires things in Latin, behold, the man who is a bean. Mr. Bean picks himself up, brushes off his suit, and runs awkwardly into the darkness. He is something otherworldly, a thing that literally fell from the sky to find comprehension. Given the parade of AI wonder after wonder in recent years, we might be excused for thinking that AI, like Mr. Bean, fell from the sky, fully formed and beyond our comprehension. However, none of this is true. Indeed, I'd argue that AI is still in its infancy. Do you see what they're doing here? They're basically saying it fell from the sky. It's just not fully formed. It's in its infancy. So my question is, was this really a copying error? A famous text where copying errors have crept in is in 1st Amule 131. The Hebrew literally reads, Saul was one year old when he became king, and he reigned two years over Israel. Since we know that Saul became king as an adult and that he reigned for more than two years, this indicates that at least two numbers were missed by an ancient copyist. I don't buy this because there's multiple places in scripture that says when people start acting a fool, like when an entire nation is in apostasy, God makes infants their rulers. So why would this be an error? I don't believe this is an error. I do think that King Saul was a baby. And in the apocrypha, it says that the antichrist is a baby. I'm not going to get into that in this video, but you guys can do your own research on that. Bear in mind, this is a book about how AI works and where it came from. Let's begin with a story. Tanya owns a successful hot sauce factory. The hot sauce recipe is Tanya's own and she guards it carefully. It's literally her secret sauce and only she understands the process of making it. Tanya employs one worker for each step of the hot sauce making process. These are human workers, but Tanya treats them as if they were machines because she's worried they'll steal her hot sauce recipe. And because Tanya is a bit of a monster, if you guys saw my recent video about energy vampires, this is definitely alluding to the harlot and the red mist in my opinion, which I believe ties into AI. In truth, the workers don't mind much because she pays them well and they laugh at her behind her back. Tanya's recipe is an algorithm. It's the set of steps that must be followed to create the hot sauce. The collection of instructions Tanya uses to tell her workers how to make the hot sauce is a program. The program embodies the algorithm in a way that the workers, the machine can follow step by step. Tanya has programmed her workers to implement her algorithm to create hot sauce. Tanya is definitely a monster for treating human beings as machines. At no point in the process of making hot sauce does any worker need to understand why they do what they do. The programmer Tanya knows why the machine, the workers, does what it does even if the machine doesn't. So again, back to my previous video about the hive mind and the red mist and the harlot. The machine doesn't understand what it's doing. It's simply performing a series of primitive instructions. In Lovelace's day, a computer was not a machine, but a human being who calculated by hand. So again, read between the lines and look at how this is set up. They tell you the story and then at the bottom as an unrelated note. The computer is not a machine. It's a human. Let's focus on what a model is, how it's made useful by conditioning and how it's used after conditioning. All this talk of conditioning and using sounds dark and sinister if not altogether evil, but I assure you it's not even though we have ways of making the model talk. A machine learning model is a black box that accepts an input. We supervise the model machine while it learns to produce correct output. In a sense, we punish the model until it gets it right. This is a dark enterprise after all. They try to make AI into a joke saying that AI fell from the sky like a bean and then they tie it to a woman named Tanya, who's a monster, right? In Acts 19, the city of Ephesus, so the city was filled with the confusion and they rushed together into the theater, dragging with them, Gaias and Aristarchus, Macedonians who were Paul's companions and travel. The assembly was in confusion and most of them did not know why they had come together. Pretty weird, right? For about two hours they all cried out with one voice. Great is the Artemis of the Ephesians. The city of the Ephesians is the temple keeper of the great Artemis and of the sacred stone that fell from the sky. So these people are all in confusion and don't know why they're doing what they're doing. They're dragging people around because they're worshiping a stone that fell from the sky and it's tied to Artemis. Skipping to Revelation 12, I know that this is about Israel slash the church. I have long held that this is like a double meaning passage, which is also how medieval Bible facts and leads viewed this passage. So a great sign appears in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun with the moon under her feet and on her head a crown of 12 stars. This is the imagery of Artemis historically. She was pregnant and was crying out in birth pains and the agony of giving birth. So she gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron. This obviously can apply to Jesus, but I think that the devil counterfeits every single thing. A male child who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, right? As you saw the iron mixed with myri clay, this is what we're made of. They will mix with one another in marriage, but they will not hold together just as iron does not mix with clay. And in the days of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed. Nor shall the kingdom be left to another people. It shall break in pieces all these kingdoms and bring them to an end and it shall stand forever. Why, graphene will soon take over the world. People get fuel right out. That's sorry. And like it continues going. It was like something like something else it cuts into. I didn't do my bigot really wait forever. It's just like I'm just listening to this. And I don't know. Like, I don't know if people get why I think that's funny, but I don't want to completely get into it. We could. We could. I was just waiting for people to come back into the room. Welcome back everybody. We were just listening to this interesting post and put up the last night about the AI and you know, this is only halfway through the video too. And so if I may, we have these patterns that overlap each other in society, in literature, in understanding and theories, take your pick, whatever, right? Like something could apply here that could apply there. Like there's associations, an overlapping of repeditiveness. Is this the fractal of our reality? Is this the repetition? But within that repetition builds the bigger flower, right? When you see the Fibonacci, right? That's this structure. And then if you like back away, like you start with the basic, right, the first two numbers. And like let's say you do the golden ratio, right? Which is the Fibonacci, right? And it starts. And if you connect all the corners of the line, it makes a spiral, right? And that is essentially like the building blocks of what we see if we looked at the heart of a sunflower, right? And then this is the same thing we see with seashells and we see this on all these natural things, you know, throughout the universe that is forming like whatever's in nature, right? Like beehives and all these things, you know, like, it's probably a shitload of things that work off the structure, right? I mean, even if you look at like the swirls of the Milky Way, people say that they see some sort of, you know, Fibonacci in there and stuff. So, and so I don't know, I don't know about all this stuff. I'm just observing, right? I'm just observing. I'm not one of those brilliant minds that sees all these things, necessarily. I'm just observing those that are and what they're commenting about. And I just, I don't know if we're getting lost in the sauce because we can't back out enough, right? But that these overlapping things like, for example, the other day, I was going through some notes because we had a room on catacombs, right? Me and Keith did months ago, right? And one of the notes in there had talked about that one, that there's all these weird things about the catacombs that we cannot explain. And it's one of these mysteries of history, like the catacombs. It's like, what the fuck were they all about? What was the reason? It wasn't, you know, that all the things that you look for for burial site aren't there. And yet that holds all these bones. And then some of them are put into very specific like arrangements. Some contain skulls that are elongated. Some of these contain skulls and bones that have been like, put holes in them and stuff. And they believe that this has to do with some sort of resonance, even like a piezoelectric kind of concept. And what's one of one little facts about this is that many catacombs share a number ratio that repeats. Yeah. And you wouldn't guess what those numbers happen to be, right? It's a 144,000. It's 369. It's 13. It's 33. It's, well, it's 106 or 104. I can't remember. I think it's 106. Right. And there was a couple, there was 911. Like there's all these numbers that we constantly see and repeat throughout our lives. You know, you flip to a page. You ran and we look at the clock. Like there's like these, these number patterns that I've begun to see. But then again, my mind is geared and tuned into looking for these numbers. Like now, because 13 was on that list, I'll start looking around and spotting 13 everywhere. Right? Because I've just tuned my intention span to them. Look, it's like if someone asks you right now, how many, you know, on the drive to work today, how many red cars did you see? You probably be like, oh, wow, you might not have any recollection of any. But if I asked you tomorrow, I want you to tell me how many red cars you see after you drive to work, you'll see a fuck time. Because while you're driving to work the next day, you'll be in your, you'll be geared towards trying to locate red cars. Now, if you shut up to work the next day and you're expecting me to ask you that, but I then said, okay, I'm glad we were back collected here again, but on your drive to work today, did you use how many blue cars you see? A person probably like, oh, I should because you weren't looking for blue cars. You're looking for red cars. So you definitely had a number for me and prepared for that, right? So like we're geared to pay attention to certain things, right? Anyway, it's just, I think it's quirky and interesting and I don't know, I think it's like, it's funny how we'll latch on to things. I don't know about what this girl's saying is she could be fucking brilliant and what she's connecting dots with and stuff. And I can't tell them mostly because I don't understand all the Bible story stuff that well, right? I was raised in it. I do have a lot of the Bible stuff in my head, but I'm not a scholar at Bible scripture and story and you know what I mean? Like, I can't recall all the stories and stuff. Maybe some of you guys were raised in that, I don't know. But I was hoping the hood would be back and some of those other individuals that were interesting. Isn't that something? What a coincidence that they're not here. So so much for finishing that conversation. You guys still there? A thumbs up would work. Anybody? Peeler? Peeler? Oh, look, there's one. Okay, so there's one person that is listening. Right? I look like more than one. I see a bunch of thumbs up. Okay, so there was a way there. That's good. Yeah. Could it be back on your stage by the way yesterday was awkward or a day before I think it was? Oh, was it? Yeah, I couldn't get in. It just said, inaccessible. It's weird. I've been getting, yeah, I've been getting feedback from some people saying things like that or that they're getting the room where you have to be able to get in the room or not into the room. Not at all. Not at all. I don't know how many co-hosts you have, but I would guess that if one of them blocked me and they left this position open, you know, just quit. The blocks with how will be stuck. I don't know. Do you think it was a block of thing? Well, I checked both you and the co-hosts at the time and neither one of you had me blocked, but it's the same symptom. Yeah, if you had a second of the co-host, that one might have done it. I'm trying to think it was a really long running room. So it's possible. It could have been a previous, yeah, host that could have blocked me. I'm not like anything else to do about being in your room, but you know, it's just awkward. No, no, I understand that. Well, thank you for telling me because it is helpful for me to know that kind of stuff. Yeah, and we were having a really interesting conversation before our commercial break. I don't know what you want to call it. I was hoping that certain individuals would have come back that we're in the conversation, but I'll say it on at least not yet. But you guys are here now and we're here and I guess like usual, a new room basically has to be treated like a brand new conversation because unfortunately, once it gets shut down, we can't continue from where we were. Can we? Well, we were both raised in the same cult. So I get that angle. And I think we can both acknowledge that most artificial intelligence is pretty damn retarded. I don't think it is, but I think it's trying to be, or it's been tuned to play dumb or give you scripted and answered to certain things. I definitely see that going on. Oh, it's much worse than that. It claims that my key latent therapy doesn't work. If you ask, does standard of my key latent work? It says no. And it'll reference the Coen 2012 study, which checks for blood in blood samples for up to four hours. It takes three days to get the maximum key latent. It's a setup. It's fraudulent all the way around. Well,