Jewish Speech is Violence

room. It was just much more enjoyable. I mean, we can figure something out. I guess we could push that, push that back and figure it out some other time. Yeah. Well, Trevor should be here. Any minute now, he's going to be a little bit late today, but not past eight. I could try to read one of Steiner's books before then. Yeah, I mean, you have to acquire a copy. Yeah. And they are kind of expensive. I have it. Yeah. Like, as you know, I have his one defriving again. And I just haven't been reading too much German lately. So I kind of need to like bring that up to pace again. But I, you know, I could read it. His writing is actually pretty clear and easy for a foreigner to understand. Unlike certain other German officers, we know him, love to write the most bombastic and bureaucratic way possible. I mean, I didn't read it in the original German, but, uh, and, uh, you know, I take the position that he's a piece of shit, but, uh, Rommel's book attacks is actually really good. The English translation is really good. Kind of a kind of an oddity because it is like pro-German 8 or World War 1. Those are even like harder to find books about Germany, like from a pro-German perspective on the first World War. We're actually harder to find than, uh, second World War 1s, funnily enough. Hmm. Yeah, I could see that just because it's, they're planning a pro-World War 1 books about Germany. It's just they're all in German and nobody took an interest in it. But people did take something of an interest in the pro-German books for World War 2. Anyway, for those of you who are listening right now, we're going to get started in about seven minutes. Uh, we, we'd start at eight sharp. So we're just killing time right now. And here we've got Trevor, Trevor, are you there? I'll be back here in a second. Trevor, are you there? Yeah, I'm here. I'm still still. I'll just get a couple things ready. All right. Cool. Yes. I'll just be on mute. All right. That's the secret. Nice to have you back in here. Again, for those you're just filtering in, we're going to get started properly at a clock. So standby. I have returned. Some of the electric counts. Excellent. So are you voting for in a month? I'm voting for Hitler. That's wrong. Univote for the Democrats to, uh, I don't know, do whatever they're going to do or the Republicans. You're going to participate in our sham democracy. Yeah, it would be kind of funny though. If I did do that, just go in there and just actually vote for the Democrats. That would be kind of funny. But I'm not going to do that. Yeah. Who'd even know, you know, that's what I hate about voting. It's like, it's not public. Like if it was public that you voted for Hitler, I would be more motivated to do it. That's kind of like the interesting thing of how much of a mess, uh, Romans, like democratic institutions were during the days of the Republic, where it was like completely like public. And you would like stand outside in like these weird like boxes. But you had like also vote like unanimously too. No, that makes complete sense though. Like in the same, for the same reason that testifying in court is completely public. And it's like, okay, who said what? Voting should also be completely public. Like, I mean, I know the counter argument is like, well, but then, then barons or what do you call them? Uh, like gang leaders are going to intimidate people into voting their way. And it's like, okay, well, if you've been, that's also been proven to have been done in like various democratic states since the end of World War two. Right. And it really happened. Now it just happens by like deception and, and well, various other means, but like it still happens. So it, I'd rather a state where you have to vote openly. The argument for it, uh, for it to be completely public is, uh, I'd say it's a lot more valid to do it that way. Cause especially with nowadays where it's like, oh, who knows who voted for who? Wow. Dead be in it. Like, like, like the whole, like the meme will sound a meme of like dead people, like voting and like, whatever. What else it just allows people to pretend that, uh, we, if we just see, secretly convince everybody that our position is correct, then we will have a victory in the election. And then political power will change. And it's like, no, that's not how it works. Like that's just, yeah. Also, it's the other thing too with that is where it's like people will like, you can't really have convictions when you do things like secretly like that. Cause that's like a lot of people that happened like during like the 2016 election where they were like, oh, well, like they didn't like, they, they weren't like convinced enough to, to like one way or the other in that street, like most elections, I would say where they essentially were like, you know, like, why would you want somebody's like vote that they're not like openly like wanting to be like, they want to be open about your position or your platform. Right. Kind of kind of, that kind of worded that in a weird way, but I think you get what I mean. And we're going to get started in just over a minute here. So as you just waiting, we will get started eight o'clock on dot as always. Welcome to the beer hall, America's most anti-Semitic free speech arena. I'm your host Greg Conte. I'm joined this week by Sigfried and by Trevor. Our topic is Jewish speech is violence. Now this rather enticing slogan came to me this week when I was writing an article to repudiate this Jewish who alleged that I call for violence against the Jewish people. And this is a very tricky thing to say. And it's clear what she's doing because the Jews love equivocation. This is like their number one thing, that inspect from fallacy. So the Jews love to take a word that means two different things or three or four different things, and then use it in one meaning to imply other meanings. And this gives them a huge advantage because if you try to take them to court on slander or libel, especially the United States where we have very weak libel laws, you really can't beat them. And then at the same time, they will use that statement that was made informally in some newspaper or some website or whatever. In the future to then call you to then call your into court for some totally unrelated allegation and say, well, we have a record here that he is violent. And if you don't believe me, you need to look no further than the Ram guys because this is the rise above movement. These were guys, many of whom went to Charlottesville and two things like the, the Berkeley protests back in 2017, where you had throngs of violent, masked antifa with weapons beating the shit out of people. And these guys went to these events and were prepared to fucking throw down because they knew they were going to be confronted by a violent antifa mob. And the way they got in trouble on court is a Jewish organization by the name of pro publica wrote articles about them saying that they intended to do violence. And then those articles were cited in the indictments by the Department of Justice against these guys that got them ended up ended with them being thrown in prison and hunted all over the world. So this is like a very clear Jewish tactic. And I don't really want to talk too much about my article just because I want to talk more like broadly about other stuff related. Like the entire thesis of Jewish speech is violence. I think is actually a great thesis. And I don't know why I didn't think of it earlier because like the typical way that goyum defend against Jewish attacks, a Jewish verbal attacks is to say, like, well, I believe in free speech. And therefore you need to let me say what I want. But in return, I'll let you say what you want. And this is like, I understand why goyum say that. And I have said that myself. But like actually, this is fucking insane. The Jews play on that. The Jews adopt themselves very well to any particular set of legal circumstances. So the Jews understand that there's free speech in America. And they're like, okay, well, that's fine. We fucking win at free speech. And the same way that US Army is like, the US Army owns the night. The Jews are like, yeah, we win at speech. So yeah, goyum, let's have, let's have like totally free speech because we will win at that. So let's open up the discussion. I'll throw this to Trevor. Can you explain to me in what way is you think that Jewish speech is violence? Yeah, sure. And if I could just tack on to kind of what you were saying a little bit earlier. Oh please do. So what what Jews do is they'll say things like, yeah, we're violently, we want violence. We call for violence and it's completely utterly wise. It's not true whatsoever. But then that enables other reporters to report that. And they can say, oh, I read that in this publication or a convene be allowed on like Wikipedia. And what we're finding now with AI is that AI will read whatever these Jewish lies about our desire for violence and then it will actually give this to people. And then people just take it as the gospel truth. And so it's increasingly dangerous. Right. Because they're tired of epistemological theory. Right. Is well, just as long as you have a valid source for it, then it's all fine. And so like valid source implies like any anti-phop blog. Like if it's an anti-phop blog and then the Department of Justice sites it, well, therefore it's true. Or it's at least true enough to cite another things. And then like once it's, then the court will take that seriously and then so on and so on. I actually, I have a name for this phenomenon. I call it info stacking. It's just like you, you're trying to like take this piece of information and advance it through various like goal posts. So you're going from one thing to another to another to another from, from a blog to a newspaper, to a court document until finally it's like enshrined in law. Like that's, that's how they do this. Yes. Absolutely. And it's much different than it was in kind of like the, you know, the OG like Logan press the days, right? You know, the lying press where you actually had like newspapers and whatever because people would have to like seek information to so easily obtained now. But the issue is that that doesn't mean that information is necessarily correct. So also when